0 votes
in Politics & Government by (200 points)

We're doing this project debat and we rly need to fnd out ;) help :D:D

55 Answers

0 votes
by (14.1m points)
 
Best answer

Well, a lot of right wing news services say this all the time, and even the more "liberal " press has repeated the claim that someone was in danger because of the recent wikileaks disclosures.

However, it doesn't seem as if that's the case. It's more likely that this is part of an attempt to marginalize wikileaks, and draw attention away from some of the deceptions revealed in the leaked documents.

The only people who are in danger are those who insist that the deceptions and frauds by military, political and diplomatic personnel are necessary to the governance of our societies.

What's been very clear, is that these lapses in ethics are contributing a great deal to the misery of our current world conflicts and we would be better off if this wasn't the standard practice of governments.

0 votes
by (14.1m points)

I have worked in DOD contracting for the past 5 years or so and WikiLeaks is the worst thing that can happen to a country. Imagine telling the enemy where and when you are going to strike during war, telling policy before it is introduced, or exposing "spies." All of this is dangerous and gets people killed. It is good when it comes to exposing environmental issues or whistle blowing on companies that are exploiting people but governments need to be kept out of it.

If you really want to debate the issue ask if you want all your secrets broadcast to your friends and enemies. Not just your secrets but the secrets you are not supposed to tell about your friends. Everyone will be pissed. This is what happens with WikiLeaks except the secrets they tell can cause one country to go to war with another country. Furthermore, there is no way to confirm the leak or determine the motive of the person who made the leak. This is why WikiLeaks cannot exist.

0 votes
by (180 points)

Pat Smith has it right on.

WikiLeaks has not exposed anyone to danger. It's the US and UK governments that put people's lives in danger. How many troops have been killed in Afghanistan?

How many people have the US and UK troops killed? Start with the Reuters employees and kids murdered by a US helicopter video that WikiLeaks released. Reuters tried for two years to get info on this, yet despite the Freedom of Info act, they were unsuccessful...

WikiLeaks released it, and the US government have largely ignored it...

0 votes
by (14.1m points)

By telling the truth and showing what a sham the political system really is. It's sacrilegious, it puts politicians out of business and slumps their approval ratings! That's outrageous!

0 votes
by (260 points)

at the beginning, Sarah Palin is a dullard. sufficient stated approximately that. Secondly, the subject this is not approximately treason considering that Assange is an Australian citizen. the subject this is approximately misappropriation of secure aspects--in essence, robbery. we can debate whether stealing labeled aspects from the State branch could desire to be seen a criminal offense on a ethical foundation, even nevertheless i don't think of there is any debate that he committed an unlawful action. in my opinion, on an analogous time as secrecy is an unattractive medium by utilizing which international kin is complete, i think of is a actuality and necessity that could desire to be accompanied. Take working example the Cuban Missile disaster, in all likelihood the closest the worldwide has ever come to a nuclear substitute, the place the alternative of that disaster became right into a deal the place missiles from Turkey have been secretly redeployed in substitute for the Soviets retreating their missiles devoid of fanfare. If at any factor aspects of that deal have been released, negotiations could have been heavily complicated, and that i could hate to ask your self on the outcomes that could have had. possibly Mr. Assange did the worldwide a provider in leaking Pentagon archives, yet i don't think of he did so here. The diplomatic cables printed that the U. S. and South Korea are gaming for the eventual cave in of South Korea to take place interior of 3 years of the large Kim's dying. It additionally printed that China does not somewhat have North Korea's back. Now North Korea is familiar with that we are biding our time till they cave in, and that they have got not got each and every individual to back them up. meaning they have 2 enjoying cards to play of their deck: submission or aggression. understanding the psychology of North Korea's chief, I even have a feeling they're going to a minimum of play up the stress card a sprint greater with those archives being printed, rather considering that they're insulated from invasion with eight-12 plutonium bombs. in short, i think of Mr. Assange has the two recklessly or intentionally endangered the worldwide by utilizing making it tougher for international kin to be practiced. optimistically he could be arrested consistent with some style of misappropriation or robbery concept, and this entire Wikileaks corporation could be finished with.

0 votes
by (220 points)

The people he's exposed are in danger obviously.

0 votes
by (900 points)

He exposes the names of undercover agents in other countries, so their goverments can kill them

0 votes
by
https://buystromectolon.com/ - buy stromectol online
0 votes
by
Levaquin Best Website In Internet
0 votes
by
<a href=https://buytadalafshop.com/>cheap cialis no prescription</a>
Welcome to zPertanyaan Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...